🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to safeguard females from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority support, the head of state could potentially return the bill for additional consideration if he holds concerns.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect similar debates in additional member states